Venus Williams vs Janette Husarova Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L L L L
Form
L W W L L L L L L LHead To Head: Williams 2 - 0 Husarova
They have played 4 sets in total, with Williams winning 4 and Husarova winning 0. The last match between Williams and Husarova was at the Acura Classic - San Diego, California, 29-07-2002, Second, Hard with Venus Williams getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 2 |
| Janette Husarova | 0 |
Acura Classic - San Diego, California(29-07-2002)
6
4
6
1
| Williams | Stats | Husarova |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 833 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 2 | Highest Rank | 31 |
| 44 | Age | 50 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 49 | Titles | 2 |
| 74% (806-277) | Career Total W/L | 54% (248-212) |
| $19,667,262 | Career Prize Money | $4,510 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Joint VS Navarro PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 9 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Venus Williams Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Diana Shnaider
Player
Venus Williams
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Venus Williams
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Venus Williams
45%
(
33 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
6
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Venus Williams
Player
Veronika Kudermetova
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Venus Williams
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Venus Williams
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Venus Williams
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
11
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
46 of
69)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
113)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Venus Williams
Player
Camila Giorgi
65%
(
82 of
126)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
117)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
52 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
117)
121
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Venus Williams
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Janette Husarova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Janette Husarova
40%
(
14 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tammi Patterson
Player
Janette Husarova
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chanelle Scheepers
Player
Janette Husarova
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olga Govortsova
Player
Janette Husarova
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olga Govortsova
Player
Janette Husarova
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Janette Husarova
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Janette Husarova
Player
Tatiana Perebiynis
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74% (806/277) | Win/Loss | 54% (248/212) |
| 70% (1734/739) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (559/488) |
| 58% (13211/9546) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4744/4592) |
| 74% (441/154) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (88/81) |
| 71% (169/68) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (114/89) |
| 77% (98/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (46/32) |
| 79% (98/26) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/5) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 2357 | Aces Total | 12 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 2739 | Total Double Faults | 40 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 336.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 381.63 |
| 59% (26228/44168) | 1st Serve % | 59% (509/869) |
| 68% (17966/26228) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (265/509) |
| 45% (8138/17961) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (164/360) |
| 46% (2667/5742) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (38/83) |
| 46% (20445/44528) | Return Points Win % | 41% (359/883) |
| 76% (271/85) | Slam W/L | 45% (23/28) |
| 70% (215/93) | Masters W/L | 46% (18/21) |
| 91% (21/2) | Cups W/L | 50% (6/6) |
| 77% (289/88) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (88/83) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 68% (80/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 75% (801/1073) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (247/454) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 58% (137/238) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (28/51) |
| 60% (188/311) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (68/131) |
| 91% (792/719) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (245/211) |
| 9% (792/71) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (245/34) |
| 29% (291/85) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (215/37) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
